Abstract
My primary premise about time given 1st paragraph "Time is a property of matter and passes at rates inversely proportional to an object's speed." I propose to show my premise is as relevant to science as was Einstein's Relativity postulates. I explain my research tactics and the results show my ideas are difficult to understand even though there is no math included. I explain that I think I know why my ideas are new and logical, and they're supported by confirmed evidence. I explain how scientists have come to see time in ways that preclude discovering what time is. In the 2nd section, I propose there is no such things as warps and curvings of space and time and that such terms are unscientific. I provide two examples of time dilation to help readers as I wish I had been helped at first. I explain precisely what time dilation is and why it occurs. Section 2 argues that time and space are not dependent upon each other as Einstein claimed, and offer clear explanations why they are not. The 3rd section includes more examples of what has caused people to make errors in critical thinking. After that is a summary focused on my initial premise with regard to how it fits without conflict with some issues but not with others. My intention is to help readers realize conformity is good to certain extents, but beyond that it can stifle our capacity to be objective in finding the truth about our world. The issues I touch on in this brief essay are not just issues in science but issues that keep us inside the so-called "box."
THOMAS GARCIA