Abstract
The nature of light is still subject to contention 107 years after Special Relativity theory (hereafter referred to as SRT). Second postulate of SRT is about the absolute constancy of speed of light. However, SRT did not solve the problem of the “local” constancy of c by means of a casual explanation, but by a postulate which simply imposed what seemed so difficult to explain, stating “a priori” that, such apparent speed constancy was a special property of light [1]. Many logical arguments are made against the “local” constancy of speed of light but none of them has been able to confirm their claim experimentally /satisfactorily. This essay suggests few experiments that can verify the constancy of speed of light for relative motion.
Mahesh Rameshbhai Patel