Abstract
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen and Bell arguments are reconsidered with reference to the relativity of space as set forth by Poincare in 1897. According to this doctrine, absolute space has no meaning, so the position or orientation of one material particle can only be discussed in relation to that of another. Defects in both references are found, and the mystery of entanglement is at least partially resolved. It is concluded that there is still room for a realistic interpretation of quantum mechanics.
Terence Nelson