Our brain is a three-pound universe where thoughts arise from the entanglement of atoms. For a long time, we believed life obeyed only classical rules, while quantum physics belonged to the tiny, cold world of particles. But new research shows that quantum effects might shape life itself, from how plants capture sunlight to how birds find their way. This essay explores whether the same strange rules could also shape our minds and consciousness. Could thought arise from quantum links inside our neurons? And if so, does the act of thinking help the universe choose its reality? “The Quantum Brain” looks at where physics, biology, and the mystery of awareness meet.
The universe unfolds in the farthest corners of our imagination, reflected through strong as well as basic colors. The swift sending of our neurons, synapses, and electrical impulses is taking place under the suave impact of the color blue; black reminds us constantly of the ironic and unknowable voids of the universe. These ingredients in combination form the human brain - a tight, three pound universe that somehow holds all of our experiences, and inside which is one of the greatest mysteries on the earth: consciousness.
Traditionally, the laws that applied to life were considered to be strictly classical. Biology was concerned with the mechanics of cells and molecules in the known and orderly world of old physics. Quantum physics, on the other hand, was left in the far and alien world of the subatomic - a place of probability and unpredictability that appeared to be quite distant from life's warmth and complexity.
This traditional divide is now rapidly collapsing. Recent research suggests that the most fundamental processes of life - from the efficiency of photosynthesis to the speed of enzymatic functions - might be operating on quantum principles. Understanding these biological systems, and ultimately the spark of consciousness, may require us to recognize that the unconventional laws of the universe are at play inside the living cell.
So how does Quantum work in biology?
Multiple life processes rely on the rules of quantum mechanics - the physics governing matter at the atomic and subatomic level. In several key biological systems, energy, and information transfer occurs with a precision and efficiency that can only be explained by these quantum effects.
Let us look at a few examples below that will demonstrate that quantum mechanics isn't just a theory of the very small; it’s an essential, active player in some of the biggest mysteries of life.
Vision, or our ability to see, starts when a light particle called a photon is absorbed by the eye. The key player here is a molecule called rhodopsin, found in special cells in the eye. Rhodopsin contains a light absorbing component called retinal. When retinal captures a photon, it undergoes an instant shape change which can be attributed to quantum mechanics. This process is effective because it has good control over the energy that has been absorbed. It loses some energy in the form of heat or light, but it most effectively initiates a cascade of chemical reactions to translate light energy into an electrical signal that is received by the brain as vision.
My next example is of the very common process - photosynthesis. Photosynthesis is how plants and certain bacteria convert sunlight into chemical energy, such as sugar. Photosynthesis is very efficient due to the fact that quantum effects prevent energy loss. When light is absorbed by the cell's light harvesting antenna (analogous to a solar panel), it jolts an electron and forms a free floating packet of energy called an exciton (an electron with a bound positive charge). For this energy to travel to the reaction center where food is synthesized, excitons employ quantum principles. Rather than walking along a single pathway, they momentarily sample many pathways simultaneously (a phenomenon known as quantum coherence). That way, the energy can rapidly locate the most direct route. Without this quantum assistance, energy transfer would be slower and much of the sun's energy would be lost as heat, which would make photosynthesis much less efficient.
And finally let us have a look at birds from a quantum perspective. Some animals, particularly birds, navigate by using the Earth's magnetic field, a phenomenon called magnetoreception. This "in-built GPS" is considered to be based on quantum entanglement. In the bird's eye, there is a protein called cryptochrome that absorbs blue light, exciting electrons and forming pairs that get entangled. This implies that the characteristics of these two electrons remain linked, irrespective of how far they move apart. The motion of these entangled electron pairs is highly sensitive to the Earth's magnetic field. By sensing minute changes governed by the magnetic field, the bird's brain is able to "see" the magnetic field as a visual pattern so that it can migrate accurately over long distances.
Now I’m not going to talk about all of biology. I want to zoom in on one corner of the mystery - the brain. The weird place where electricity turns into thought.
This essay will try to decipher two big questions – How do quantum entanglement and consciousness coalesce? And how does the brain manage coherence in its pandemonium? I am not saying “the brain is quantum.” Instead, I want to figure out if the quantum world can play a real role in our brain.
The brain is an intricate web comprised of billions of neurons. We typically comprehend it by applying classical physics. Some scientists believe that quantum mechanics, which is concerned with extremely small objects, may be able to explain specific brain functions. This might assist us in knowing how the brain operates rapidly and efficiently and even throw some light on the enigma of consciousness.
Throughout the years, scientists have had various notions about how quantum phenomena could occur in the brain. One prominent notion is by Stuart Hameroff, an American anesthesiologist, and Sir Roger Penrose, a Nobel Prize winning physicist from United Kingdom. They proposed that consciousness arises from quantum activity within microtubules, small tube like structures within neurons. These microtubules could operate similar to quantum processors, storing information in a unique state until something random occurs, generating flashes of consciousness.
Another such ideology considers quantum tunneling in signaling. Neurons transmit signals through structures known as ion channels, which permit charged particles, or ions, to travel through them. Quantum tunneling, one theory proposes, could be a process that ions use to travel through barriers they would not otherwise be able to, and it would be more efficient signaling.
There is also the concept of quantum coherence in networks. The longer that quantum particles remain in synchrony in the brain's warm and wet environment (37∘C or 98.6∘F), the more they could impact how signals pass along neural networks. This could be the key to improving the brain's ability to process information.
The greatest hindrance to proving these theories is the environment of the brain. It is a hot and disorganized system, which is not good for sensitive quantum states. Quantum phenomena such as superposition and coherence are quickly destroyed by the environment, a phenomenon known as environmental decoherence. The key scientific objective is to determine whether the brain has developed methods of preserving and leveraging these sensitive quantum phenomena. This challenge sits at the exciting crossroads of physics, biology, and neuroscience.
What exactly is the problem of decoherence?
Quantum states are delicate, as soap bubbles are - they burst when they come into contact with the dirty external universe. That is decoherence. In biological environments, these bubbles cannot survive for long. To illustrate, in a two-slit experiment (an experiment that shows that light and matter have both wave and particle properties), a photon may form an interference pattern if no one observes it. But if you touch it, even by merely looking at it, the pattern vanishes instantly. Now, think about your ions, your proteins, or your microtubules in your neurons - your "quantum bubbles". How do they burst?
Max Tegmark (a Swedish-American physicist) demonstrated, decoherence timescales (how quickly a tiny quantum effect gets ruined or disappears) in neural environments can be as short as 10-13 seconds, way faster than the millisecond scale processes that define neural firing (when a nerve cell sends an electrical signal) and cognition. This massive temporal gap (a time difference between two events) suggests that any quantum coherence would be destroyed before it could influence neuronal behavior (how brain cells act or send signals).
Yet, this limitation has not stopped the research. Instead, it has inspired them to search for special conditions or microenvironments (special spots or areas inside cells) where coherence may play a role. The challenge here, is not just theoretical but greatly experimental: how do we detect, measure, or even find quantum phenomena within the complexity of the brain?
To figure this out, scientists have turned to tools of quantum physics and biophysics. One such tool is known as Quantum Spin Resonance (QSR), which is capable of detecting mild responses in proteins that may obey quantum mechanical principles. Two other significant methods assist with this investigation: Ultrafast Spectroscopy, which is like a high-speed camera to quickly capture what molecules change in fractions of a second, and Single Molecule Fluorescence Imaging, which captures the weak light from single molecules and allows researchers to observe details otherwise difficult to envision. By using these techniques on neurons, researchers hope to determine whether brain cells employ a comparable, energy efficient quantum mechanism for passing on energy.
Scientists also employ quantum sensors, which can sense extremely weak magnetic fields. These instruments assist with the difficulties of quantum decoherence. Scientists would like to integrate these sensors with brain imaging to identify small quantum signals in neurons. Quantum simulation and computing are also worth their while in this work. Quantum computers utilize quantum effects such as superposition and entanglement. They are usually employed to simulate molecules' complex interactions in the brain. Such simulations are important in testing for possibilities and lifespans of fragile quantum effects in the brain's environment.
Now let’s dig into consciousness.
Consciousness might not just come from regular brain activity but could be connected to the strange rules of the quantum world. Henry Stapp (an American mathematical physicist) suggested that the tiniest parts of our brain, like atoms (basic building blocks of matter) and ions (charged particles), exist in a kind of “could be” state, not fully decided until something happens. This could mean that our thoughts and attention can dominate, helping certain patterns in our brain last longer and shape the flow of our conscious experience.
John Hodgson (senior researcher at the University of California) discussed mind and brain as two sides of the same coin. This approach may imply that thinking is intimately connected with the quantum behavior of the brain and not with mere physical processes (usual chemical reactions or electrical impulses in the brain). It also suggests that our perception of one moment is the result of the brain uniting data from disparate regions to create a default integration in the entire brain. From this concept, a potential explanation for some mental illnesses appears. Disorders such as schizophrenia and dissociative identity disorder could occur when this more general connection within the brain fails. In this perspective, when components of the brain no longer function cooperatively and operate independently, it may result in disorganized thinking and perception in schizophrenia or the independent personalities associated with dissociative identity disorder. Healthy and integrated consciousness is likened to an organized quantum system.
Sir Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff have put forward a theory whereby consciousness is not in the form of usual computation. Rather, they imagine that the mind assembles millions of possible ideas into one cohesive thought using a unique form of quantum computing. This specific process, they theorize, occurs inside the microtubules - small, tubular protein structures within the neurons of the brain. These microtubules are postulated to help the brain probe many possibilities at once, a property typical of quantum mechanics, and thus radically change how we think and perceive reality. But here’s the problem: biology shows microtubules might not be able to keep this quantum activity going long enough for it to matter.
John Eccles (Nobel Laurette and neurophysiologist) proposed that quantum effects at nerve endings could influence how neurons release chemical signals. Each tiny “decision” at a synapse (connection between neurons) could be a unit of mental activity, or a “psychon.” Though this is a just a theoretical assumption and there is still not enough proof that this really happens in the brain; the theory also doesn’t explain how one choice is picked over another.
There is another viewpoint also in the same context. Some scientists, namely Giuseppe Ricciardi (physicist), Hiroomi Umezawa (theoretical physicist), Walter Freeman (biologist, theoretical neuroscientist), and Giuseppe Vitiello (physicist) looked at the brain as a system where many neurons work together in a sync. Consciousness could result from how such groups of neurons behave towards each other, with memories being saved as patterns as in physics. This will keep the brain clear and coherent (organized and smooth) without each individual neuron having to behave in a special way. But again, there’s no evidence.
What all these ideas have in common is this: consciousness might involve the weird, complicated rules of quantum physics. It could allow our brains to integrate information, hold multiple possibilities at once, and even connect distant regions in ways classical biology alone can’t explain. These theories suggest that to understand consciousness we might need to look at the brain not just as a biological uncertainty (something living that is hard to predict), but as a place where the strange laws of the quantum world meet the uncertainty of thought.
The future of consciousness research is like a science fiction story with a physics book in one hand. Imagine quantum sensors (super sensitive measuring tools that detect tiny quantum effects) exploring the brain like very sensitive tools on a Mars rover, while low temperature neural studies (experiments on brain cells kept very cold) allow us to listen to the quiet signals of electrons in synapses. Hybrid quantum biological systems (mixes of quantum devices and living cells) could soon let us play with the basic parts of thought, as if we are fixing the universe’s most complex code.
Quantum theory provides a new path to investigating consciousness. On the computational front, quantum simulations - quantum based models - can do things conventional computers can't. They can assist us in understanding the brain's intricate web and discovering how consciousness functions. More significantly, we can merge quantum information theory, the study of how small particles store and process information, with cognitive neuroscience, the investigation of how the brain works. This merger might cause us to uncover the real nature of consciousness. Rather than perceiving it as mystical, we would understand it as an intricate interplay between matter and information. Consciousness may be the result of fundamental physical laws that we are only beginning to grasp.
Life runs on chemistry, and chemistry runs on physics, but maybe that’s not the whole story. If the building blocks of life follow quantum rules, then biology might be more connected to the strange world of particles than we ever thought. Nature could already be using quantum tricks in ways we’re only beginning to see. Understanding that connection could help us find answers about evolution, health, and consciousness itself. The secret to life might not just lie in genes or molecules, but in the quantum laws that built the universe in the first place.
The Quantum Box
I’d like to conclude this discussion with a few questions that I can’t stop thinking about. These questions arose when I read the novel 'Dark Matter' by Blake Crouch, and since then, they have lingered in my mind, waiting for answers.
Imagine there’s a “quantum box” that can put a whole person, body, brain, and all, into a quantum superposition, existing in many universes at once. While this happens, their mind is switched off so they don’t mess it up by observing it. Then, after a while, their consciousness turns back on.
Now here’s the puzzle (or shall I say puzzles): when they wake up, do they choose which universe they end up in? Or do they just wake up in the one that physics says they should? And what if they open their eyes in a world where that box was never built. How can it even exist there if it’s the thing that brought them over?
One more twist: what if they wake up too soon, before the quantum state fully collapses? Would that half aware mind somehow influence which world becomes real, or is consciousness only possible once the quantum dice have already rolled?
That something for you to think about.
1. Alvarez, P. H., Gerhards, L., Solov’yov, I. & de Oliveira, M. C. (2024). Quantum phenomena in biological systems. Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.3389/frqst.2024.1466906
2. Tegmark, M. (2000). Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes.. Physical Review E, 61(4). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.61.4194
3. Tegmark, M. (2000). Why the brain is probably not a quantum computer. Information Sciences, 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-0255(00)00051-7
4. Lloyd, S. (2011). Quantum coherence in biological systems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 302, 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/302/1/012037
5. B.K. Ard. (2014). Is there a link between quantum mechanics and consciousness? In C. Smith & H. Whitaker (Eds.), Brain, mind and consciousness in the history of neuroscience (History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, Vol. 6). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8774-1_15
6. Gao, S. (2008). A Quantum Theory of Consciousness. Minds and Machines, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-007-9084-0