How Quantum is Life?

Note that you must be an accepted competitor or an FQxI Member to log in here and rate the essays.

  • If you're a contestant, you must log in using your pseudonymous email account. If you haven't reset your password yet, click on the 'Forgot Password?' link. If you're neither a contestant nor an FQxI member, please use the Like system to indicate which essays you like.

Abstract

Various moral conundrums plague population ethics: The Non-Identity Problem, The Procreation Asymmetry, The Repugnant Conclusion, and more. I argue that the aforementioned moral conundrums have a structure neatly accounted for, and solved by, some ideas in computability theory. I introduce a mathematical model based on computability theory and show how previous arguments pertaining to these conundrums fit into the model. This paper proceeds as follows. First, I do a very brief survey of the history of computability theory in moral philosophy. Second, I follow various papers, and show how their arguments fit into, or don't fit into, our model. Third, I discuss the implications of our model to the question why the human race should or should not continue to exist. Finally, I show that our model ineluctably leads us to a Confucian moral principle.
Jonogmin Baek
0 Likes 5 Ratings